The suffering that has been brought upon us, while it does not necessarily redeem, nor is worshipped, becomes an expressed aesthetic. A loquacious, grouchy teenager, and a middle-aged New Yorker who wears his scarf in the most sensible fashion – these are the protagonists, these are the suffering.
Flesh out the suffering in us, dramatize its complex layers so that we do not just watch passively, compel us to actively perceive, and you’ve got a movie that makes a stain in our minds. And it’s a stain we don’t want to wash away.
Shame
My favorite scene from the movie covered in a spot-on review by Anthony Lane of the New Yoker: "Take the wordless subway ride, early in the movie, that finds Brandon, impeccably swathed in coat and scarf, sitting diagonally opposite a young woman. To witness the back-and-forth of their flirtation is like watching Nadal versus Federer on clay. Topspin smiles are dinked across the car, lips are slyly moistened, and McQueen even lobs in a late twist, as the woman proves to be wearing not just a kindly smile but a wedding ring—a combination guaranteed to stir our hero’s loins. The entire sequence is perfect, and PG-rated, and if “Shame” had stopped there it would have been a poem." Read more here.Margaret
On the final scene, the mother and daughter sit on a performance of Offenbach's Tales of Hoffman in the New York Opera House. In catharsis, they both explode in tears. Thomas Caldwell of Cinema Autopsy described this scene in a most interesting review: "... a strong case that narrative art – like cinema – still has the power to transcend reality and emotionally connect with people when everything else feels muted by cynicism and resignation." The full review is here.Perhaps the suffering is conquerable. It might have been a feeling of transcendence from narrative art, or contemplating the poetry in the scenes. I couldn't rationalize my sense of optimism after watching both of these movies, but I am relieved that the optimism isn't feigned.