Reading and Reviewing while Daddying (I read this book two months ago, when my first kid was born.)
The Rachel Papers, Martin Amis. There were Martin Amis books on the bargain and that got me to thinking how there must have been something flawed with literature that got dumped to the discounted shelf. But the truth is – there are a lot of gold mines hidden in that septic tank: Graham Greene, James Joyce, Dante, et.al., waiting to be picked like low-hanging fruits.
The decision-making involved in buying this book was easy because of two major influences.
(a) I browsed through the first few pages and read the phrase, “a chartreuse caterpillar of glinting phlegm.” I flipped through it some more and found the phrase “Dionysian bathroom sex.” I generalize that what those phrases hinted this book as wildly thought-of (to describe phlegm like that) and I’m going to be delighted with either sexual or toilet humor that’s eloquently written.
(b) I never heard of Martin Amis, but Vintage published him in a collection that included Irvine Welsh, Philip Roth, Charles Dickens and Fyodor Dostoevsky. And this quite-decent edition only costs 99 pesos. Gold mine.
Before reading the book, I googled some reviews on The Rachel Papers and the New York Times (by Grace Glueck) went:
What's lacking is the ability to animate the other characters so that they become more than mere projections of Charles, and to provide the kind of plot invention that would make the book more than an easy-reading, mildly funny series of bed-and-bathroom observations. In the end, I'm afraid, even Charles comes off as too much of a type. I'm sure he'll grow up to work for The Times Literary Supplement.
After having read the book, I was largely against the stand of the review I found in the New York Times.
This was Martin Amis’ first novel and very early on he was armed with a powerful vocabulary, along with the ability to put words well and together. More importantly, he had a grand, accurate notion of how it is to be Nineteen Years Old. Aside from the natural self-obsession of teenagers on zits and things, here are three more things to describe the protagonist, Charles Highway:
(a) "the big thing about me is that I wank a devil of a lot."
(b) He can make a girl bleed out “all dignity in a series of hot, fetid squirts.”
(c) He does research and notes for dates (e.g., sees movies the day before he goes out on a date to see the same movie).
Forgive the misogynist quip, but the NY Times reviewer probably lacked male hormones (i.e., balls) and the resulting similar experiences of embarrassment that came with having a load of those hormones. And it all comes out perfectly funny and entertainingly sexual. To highlight: in pages One Hundred to One Hundred Two, he devotes a full account of snogging. In page Ninety Three he lists Certainties & Absurdities: Anxiety Top Ten. This book is too smart to be the male version of chic-lit.
One of my all-time-favorite movies, The History Boys, comes close to this book. Well, they’re all English teenagers trying to get into Oxford. Except that none of the History Boys employed their intelligence to score. Compared to Charles Highway, the History Boys are all gay and bloody gutless.